Campaign Against Anti-Semitism v DPP [2019] EWHC 9 (Admin)

“The court had to consider the balance between freedom of expression and the need to maintain public order, and to determine whether the DPP had acted irrationally in taking over and discontinuing a private prosecution on the grounds that particular words were not ‘abusive’ for the purposes of section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 ...”